“Oh... are ya’ workin’ on a new AP?”
AP being what you’re reading right now.
No, actually not.
What is this? I’m getting grief for having not posted any brilliance here in almost two weeks? Two weeks?! Has it been that long? Hmmm, bad sign, I’m afraid.
“Should I be?”
“You better.”
Fine.
But first, here’s a pop quiz:
Which of the following are reflective of – and therefore valuable indicators to – my state of mind?
- the state of my house
- the state of my office
- the state of my car
- the state of my blog
- all of the above
If you didn’t select “e,” then you should go back and try again – because, it turns out, that is the correct answer.
Fortunately, I did have some material on standby.
My sister called me yesterday to share this:
My niece received some kind of electronic device for Christmas that included a “wall-wart” power supply.
Attached to said power supply was the following extremely valuable warning sticker:
“This power unit is intended to be correctly orientated in a vertical or floor-mount position” or equivalent wording.
Yes... the handy warning sticker actually has the words “or equivalent wording” at the end.
It’s one thing to be stupid. It’s yet another to document it.
Clearly, there’s some message – a safety-related message, at that – that somebody, somewhere, is trying to communicate to me, but apparently their tinfoil hat is scrambling the signal.
(Incidentally, I know the problem couldn’t be with my tinfoil hat — its only purpose is to enforce the terms of my contract with Major League Baseball; specifically, I can’t rebroadcast their games without their consent, and they can’t rebroadcast my thoughts to the CIA without my consent or influence my opinion by having Alan Colmes say anything seemingly sensible, ever. So far, it’s working.)
Otherwise, I can’t figure out what the “equivalent wording” might be.
I googled for the message. Naturally, Google asks:
Did you mean: "This power unit is intended to be correctly oriented in a vertical or floor-mount position"
Yeah, no kidding. I guess just using (or, “utilizating”) a non-made-up word would be a start, but no, I want to see if I can track down the original message, first.
I did, and it’s much worse than I feared.
The Underwriters’ Laboratories (you know… the people whose stamp of approval is intended to document that the manufacturer has complied with regulations intended to ensure the safety of a device so long as it’s used for its intended purpose) “UL Asia” web site spells out the new rule that took effect in 2006:
UL 1310 Class 2 Power Units, 4th Edition: The operating orientation of a direct plug-in power unit shall be indicated in the instructions as follows: “This power unit is intended to be correctly orientated in a vertical or floor mount position” or equivalent wording.
Abandon hope all ye who enter here.
Actually, even that one is screwed up – it’s from the H. F. Cary translation into English of Dante’s Divine Comedy. The original is actually “All hope abandon ye who enter here.” But at least the message is discernible: “Don’t y’all reckon y’all may as well give up?”
So what, if anything, is the meaning of this jumble of words?
I can’t tell you what UL 1310 says, because that’s a book you have to buy, for the low, low price of $564.00... so scratch that.
I did find instruction manuals for a couple of cordless telephones, featuring the same language... which may shed some light on the subject.
This power unit is intended to be correctly orientated in a vertical or floor mount position. The prongs are not designed to hold the plug in place if it is plugged into a ceiling or an under the table/cabinet outlet.
Stupid, but okay – that helps. A little: You’re supposed to plug it in on the wall or on the floor, because it’s not intended to be plugged in to an electrical outlet that faces downward – like you’d find under a cabinet. Or on the ceiling. (See? Helpful stuff!) The design doesn’t anticipate the weight of the entire wall-wart being supported by the prongs.
Got it.
Although... I’m nearly 100% certain that the sticker, as written, wouldn’t even give anyone a hint of what they weren’t supposed to do. Or were. Some users of the same equipment now in the custody of my 6-year-old niece probably ended up voting for Pat Buchanan while trying to correctly orientate the power cord for their unit.
I can’t imagine why nobody bothers to read these instructions. You?
Oh... on that cordless phone, there were a couple of other helpful hints:
Plug the power adaptor into an electrical outlet that is near the equipment and easily accessible.
Novel! And here I was, planning to use the outlet behind the heavy desk on the other side of the room. I didn’t even think of using this one right here near the equipment that happens to be easily accessible.
Do not use the telephone to report a gas leak in the vicinity of the leak.
As my mother used to ask, “Why did you bring that book I didn’t want to be read to out of up for?”
What’s in the vicinity of what, in this piece of syntactical brilliance?
It seems to me that I’m being warned not to use a telephone –period – to report a gas leak that is in the vicinity of the gas leak itself. I guess if a gas leak is in its own vicinity, you should simply not report it. He who smelt it probably dealt it, anyway.
Avoid using a telephone (other than a cordless type) during an electrical storm. There may be a remote risk of electrical shock from lightning.
Actually, there are two distinct problems with this warning...
The first is that the risk is actually not a risk that “may be,” and is not necessarily even all that “remote” – using a hard-line telephone during an electrical storm (presumably, we’re talking about a thunderstorm – not a coronal mass ejection or other atmospheric “electrical storm” event) is actually hazardous... and the risk is not “electrical shock” – it’s something a bit more serious, such as death by electrocution.
Also, never mind the fact that this tidbit appears in the instruction manual for a cordless phone.
Only put the handset of your telephone next to your ear when it is in normal talk.
Idiots. This one is actually sensible, if they would state the reason – you don’t want it ringing right next to your ear… which it could do at any time when it is not “in normal talk.”
For all of these safety warnings, I — somehow — do not feel especially safe.
First it was shower radios with stern warnings about not using them near the bathtub.
Then it was a satellite receiver that should not be used as a place to set your candles.
Now, an electrical plug that can’t hang from the ceiling — or at least is not supposed to.
It’s all very disorientating.
Or equivalent wording.
